北京地区温度要素模式预报和客观方法检验评估
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

冬奥赛场定点气象要素客观预报及风险预警技术研究及应用(2018YFF0300104)、国家重点研发计划(2018YFF0300104)、气象预报业务关键技术发展专项(YBGJXM(2018)03)、基于机器学习的冬奥精细天气预报技术研发及示范应用(Z201100005820002)、北京市气象局科技项目(BMBKJ201703001)资助


Evaluation of Models and Objective Methods for Temperature in Beijing Area
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    利用2018年10月1日至2019年9月30日北京地区55个地面气象站的实况观测数据对欧洲中期天气预报中心的全球预报(ECMWFthin)、国家气象中心区域预报(Grapes)、北京睿图(RMAPS)、国家级指导预报(SCMOC)、北京智能网格温度客观预报(BJTM)和集合相似预报(AnEn)的逐日最高、最低气温预报结果进行检验评估。结果表明:①ECMWFthin模式预报效果优于Grapes和RMAPS,客观方法BJTM和AnEn对ECMWFthin的改进效果明显。②AnEn在10月至次年4月预报效果好,BJTM在5—9月预报效果好;不同预报时效中,AnEn在短期、中期前段预报效果较好,BJTM在中期5~9 d预报效果相对较好。③以南郊观象台为代表站进行检验,结果显示模式预报均存在明显的系统偏差,客观方法对系统偏差有很好的订正效果。④在降水、大风或无天气系统时,BJTM、AnEn的日最高温度预报准确率较高;雾霾天气背景下,ECMWFthin的最高温度预报准确率较高。雾霾、大风和无天气系统时,ECMWFthin最低温度预报偏差最小,客观方法对模式预报无改进;降水天气背景下,RMAPS和BJTM对最低温度的预报偏差最小。

    Abstract:

    Compared with the observations from 55 Beijing auto weather stations from 1 October 2018 to 30 September 2019, the European Center MediumRange Weather Forecasts Fine Grid Model (ECMWFthin), Regional Assimilation and Prediction System (Grapes), Rapidrefresh Multiscale Analysis and Prediction System - Short Term (RMAPSST), Central Station Guided Forecast (SCMOC), Beijing Intelligent Grid Temperature Objective Prediction Method (BJTM) and Analog Ensemble method (AnEn) which mainly focus on the daily maximum and minimum temperature in the Beijing area are evaluated. (1) In total, the results show that ECMWFthin model performance was better than Grapes and RMAPS; Two objective methods, BJTM and AnEn, had apparent improvement effects on ECMWFthin. (2) AnEn performed well from October 2018 to April 2019, and BJTM performed well from May to September 2019. Regarding different forecast timeliness, AnEn performed well in the shortterm and the first part of mediumterm, BJTM performed well in 5 to 9 days in mediumterm. (3) Focusing on the Guanxiangtai station, the systematic deviation was evident in all three models. Objective methods reduced the systematic deviation of models. (4) Under the background of precipitation, wind and no obvious weather, the two objective methods BJTM and AnEn had significantly improved the forecast quality of the ECMWFthin model for daily maximum temperature. However, when haze weather happened, the forecast accuracy of ECMWFthin was significantly higher than other models and methods. For the minimum daily temperature, except for precipitation weather background, the ECMWFthin model had the smallest deviation, and objective methods slightly improved the model results. Moreover, the RMAPS results showed better performance when precipitation occurred, and objective methods reduced the systematic deviation of the largescale model.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

赵桂洁,何娜,郝翠,李靖,李桑.北京地区温度要素模式预报和客观方法检验评估[J].气象科技,2021,49(6):869~877

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-25
  • 定稿日期:2021-08-25
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-12-29
  • 出版日期: 2021-12-31
您是第位访问者     版权所有:气象科技编辑部    
主办单位:中国气象局气象探测中心,中国气象科学研究院,北京市气象局,国家卫星气象中心,国家气象信息中心
     地址:北京市海淀区中关村南大街46号       邮编:100081      电话 :010-68407256      传真:010-68407256
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司