Comparative Analysis of Uncertainty Evaluation of Platinum Resistor Temperature Sensors between Onsite and Laboratory Verification Results
DOI:
CSTR:
Author:
Affiliation:

Clc Number:

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    At present, there are two types of verification of platinum resistance temperature sensors in automatic meteorological stations in China,i.e., onsite verification and laboratory verification. As instructed in the related verification regulations (JJG (Meteorology) 0022015 Platinum Resistance Temperature Sensor of Automatic Weather Station), onsite verification and laboratory verification are separately performed for the same platinum resistance temperature sensor, and the measurement uncertainty is determined using the GUM (Guide to the Uncertainty in Measurement) method based on the results of both types of verification. The result shows that the uncertainty evaluation of onsite verification is higher than that of laboratory verification. The causes of differences in measurement uncertainty between the two types of verification are analyzed. It is suggested that the laboratory verification should be used in the verification of platinum resistance temperature sensors for automatic meteorological stations.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

龚熙,曾涛,王延东,刘园园.铂电阻温度传感器现场检定和实验室检定不确定度评定对比分析[J].气象科技英文版,2020,48(1):76-80.

Copy
Related Videos

Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:February 18,2019
  • Revised:May 31,2019
  • Adopted:
  • Online: February 26,2020
  • Published:
Article QR Code
You are thevisitors     Copyright:    
Organizer:中国气象局气象探测中心,中国气象科学研究院,北京市气象局,国家卫星气象中心,国家气象信息中心
     Address:北京市海淀区中关村南大街46号       E-mail:100081      Telephone :010-68407256      Fax:010-68407256
Supported by:Beijing E-Tiller Technology Development Co., Ltd.